While there is significant variation in merit selection systems, states generally utilize nominating commissions to screen candidates and present a slate to the governor, who must select from among the nominees. To empirically test his propositions, Goelzhauser amasses an impressive dataset with approximately 190,000 judge-vacancy observations from Alaska that include individuals who applied for each judicial vacancy since admission to statehood (p. 85). While major political parties have been shut out of the merit selection system, the public is still allowed and encouraged to participate, voicing their opinions on judges when they are up for retention elections. Debates over judicial selection are often framed as a choice between contested elections and merit selection, in which a nominating commission vets potential candidates who are appointed by the governor and then typically stand for periodic yes-or-no retention elections. There are of course valid reasons for withholding certain types of information related to judicial applications, given privacy concerns. Recent research suggests, for example, that campaign spending affects judges decisions on the bench.5 Yet other problems cut across selection methods, including a lack of diversity on the bench and evidence that concerns about job security impact judges decisions in controversial cases. The Governor must select from the list. Even the best judges disagree with one another: look at the Supreme Court of the United States, which is filled with constitutional scholars from Ivy League law schools who have decades of experience as lawyers and judges, splitting 4-4-1 in the pivotal Obamacare case, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sibelius. In addition, how does merit selection affect the applicant pools for judicial vacancies? See generally Kevin Costello, Supreme Court Politics and Life Tenure: A Comparative Inquiry, 71 Hastings L.J. Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds recently signed legislation that would increase her appointment power over the states judicial merit selection commission by removing the senior supreme court justice from the 17-member commission and giving the governor the authority to fill the particular seat. And the promise of higher-quality judges, greater diversity, and reduced partisanship seems to be highly dependent on whether the merit selection applicant pool is somehow distorted (p. 79). One particularly interesting aspect of the narrative in Chapter 2 involves Goelzhausers discussion of the public comment period during the commissions screening of applicants (p. 26). The above two posts make it completely clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians are elected. Adam Liptak & Janet Roberts, Campaign Cash Mirrors a High Courts Rulings, N.Y. Times, Oct. 1, 2006, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/us/01judges.html?pagewanted=all. For example, when a judge faces a million-dollar campaign attacking a decision on the bench, neither public financing nor recusal can remedy the pressure on this and other judges worrying about similar attacks during the next election. . Merit selection acknowledges and accounts for the thought that knowing what individual character traits and characteristics comprise a qualitatively "good" judicial candidate are not necessarily something within the public sphere of knowledge. There are numerous ways of thinking about justiceso many that there is an entire field of thought for it, called jurisprudence. With only a small set of values allowed, only those values will be used to make judicial decisions, which stagnates innovation in the law and prevents society from progressing. Additionally, allowing voters to choose judges, in a way, makes judicial appointment political: voters will vote for judges they agree with, and if popular opinion swings in a way that becomes unconstitutional (an outrageous example would be if, suddenly, the majority of people thought slavery was acceptable again), it may result in numerous judges who thought in the same vein. Jacob E. Tuskai graduated from Barrett, The Honors College at Arizona State University in 2020 with a bachelor of arts degree (summa cum laude) in U.S. history. III, 1 (The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. What that best way is, of course, subject to that debate. According to Goelzhauser, if merit selection works as intended, commissions and governors should be selecting on qualifications and diversity rather than political considerations (p. 56). The nonpartisan election of judges is a selection method where judges are chosen through elections where they are listed on the ballot without an indication of their political affiliation. Merit selection arguably the most effective way to appoint a judge but it also has its pros and cons but the ultimate question is whether or not the retention election is a success or failure in the judicial system. But no state has moved from contested elections to a merit selection system in more than 30 years. Finally, he examines how the institutional design of merit selection affects committee capture, which could negatively affect merit selection performance. Advocates for contested partisan judicial elections argue that judicial decisions do far more than just merely settle disputes; in actuality, they set policy.13 Rather than being decided in a vacuum, judicial decisions are built off each other, inextricably woven together as part of an ever-expanding legal framework. What solutions would you impose? These are difficult questionsand areas for further researchbut they highlight that there may be opportunities to truly rethink how states choose their judges and develop models that better respond to todays needs. The concern with capture is that it can have deleterious effects on judicial performance as certain interests work to shape a judiciary that aligns with their preferences, as opposed to a focus on merit. Q. Any alternative system of choosing judges will have its own advantages and disadvantages, and may advance or impede important values related to the selection of judgesincluding judicial independence, judicial accountability and democratic legitimacy, judicial quality, public confidence in the courts, and diversity on the bench.27 There are important empirical questions about the likely impact of different systems on these values. Finally, another con of a merit-based system of appointing judges is that deciding, once and for all, what it means to be a "good" judge is inherently impirical. Not all areas elect them, though. The views expressed are solely those of the author. See Kathleen L. Barber, Ohio Judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with Partisan Results, 32 Ohio St. L.J. Ads routinely use political signals, such as touting a judges conservative values or identifying endorsements from groups like the National Rifle Association. Our summaries and analyses are written by experts, and your questions are answered by real teachers. There probably is no perfect way to select and retain judges, because we don't live in a perfect society. It is, however, intended to provide a high-level discussion for the various methods (some of which are well-known nationally, while some are not), some perceived benefits and downfalls of each, and some history for each along the way. The judge then . 579, 640 (2005) (noting Professor Raoul Berger traced the phrase hold their Offices during good Behaviour to the [British] Act of Settlement of 1701 (which protected the independence of English judges by granting them tenure as long as they conduct[ed] themselves well, and provided for termination only through a formal request by the Crown of the two Houses of Parliament) and to earlier English traditions) (citing Raoul Berger, Impeachment of Judges and Good Behavior Tenure, 79 Yale L.J. Gerald C. Wright, Charles Adrian and the Study of Nonpartisan Elections, 61 Pol. Merit selection: Merit selection was devised as a means of separating judges from the election process. On the down side, critics indicate that judges should spend their time reducing the backlog of cases rather than campaigning for office, that elections force candidates to solicit campaign contributions from lawyers and possible litigants, and candidates may wind up deep in debt or may lack sufficient money to properly inform the voters of their merits. Advocates of the merit system indicate that a nominating committee that includes lawyers brings expertise to the selection process, and is an improvement upon an election system where voters are uninformed, or not in a position to evaluate judicial performance. 3. You left off the third - and best choice -- appointment followed by retention elections. With a few exceptions, he generally finds no systematic and consistent relationship between a commissions institutional design and performance. 1. Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation. 2022 American Bar Association, all rights reserved. These methods are as follows: executive appointment, election, and merit selection. Rather than glad-handing politicians to secure an appointment, the aspiring judge must appeal to the people he hopes to serve. In the words of the late California Supreme Court Justice Otto Kaus, deciding controversial cases when you know you will be facing an election is like finding a crocodile in your bathtub when you go in to shave in the morning. The second set of proposals has focused on judicial selection reform, typically urging states to replace contested elections with a merit selection system. 265, 27475 (2008). As states such as Iowa and Pennsylvania debate their judicial selection systems, whether merit selection works is the key question that motivates Greg Goelzhausers innovative and timely inquiry in Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts, the latest addition to Goelzhausers extensive research on state judicial merit selection. In Minnesota, North Dakota, and Georgia, for example, all current supreme court justices were initially appointed to the bench. As such, the What are some pros and cons of appointed judges? While a handful of states moved from partisan to nonpartisan contested elections over the past decade, few states have adopted major changes in how they choose judges since the 1980s, and recent changes have not reflected any consistent trends.25, Even more importantly, merit selection raises its own problems. Used by the state to select judges for its appellate and trial courts, the Ohio method of judicial selection consists of an initial partisan primary election, followed by a nonpartisan general election.21 Ohio first implemented contested partisan judicial elections in 1851, later moving to nonpartisan judicial elections under its 1911 Nonpartisan Judiciary Act. During the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress along with the White House. However, Goelzhausers discussion illustrates that some states allow for modest inclusion of public views on potential nominees. What are the strengths and weakness of the legislative branch? Pros And Cons Of Merit Selection. 8. eNotes.com will help you with any book or any question. These findings would seem to bode well for those who champion merit selections ability to ensure that quality jurists are nominated and appointed. A : Judicial candidates are prohibited from making predictions and promises about legal issues that might come before their courts. Latest answer posted December 11, 2020 at 11:00:01 AM. Due to the nature of the Senate confirmation process, past nominees have tended to skew more toward the political center as a way to increase the nominees chance of receiving a simple majority of the vote.4 From there, unless their actions result in impeachment and conviction (the most recent removal from the bench being G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Louisiana under charges of bribery and perjury),5 federal judges are free to decide cases without fear of political retribution. Specifically, attorneys who are ideologically congruent with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships (p. 87). Nor have states that use merit selection generally had success in ensuring a diverse bench, raising questions about their processes for recruiting and vetting judicial candidates.26. Sherrilyn A. Ifill, Judicial Diversity, 13 Green Bag 45, 48 (2009), available at http://www.greenbag.org/ v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf. 30. Tony A. Freyer, American Liberalism and the Warren Courts Legacy, in 27 Revs. The jury system works by using a group of people from the community. At the same time, almost every state gives the governor the power to make appointments for interim vacancies, which occur when a seat opens before the end of a judges term. Democrats described the move as a power grab. The impact of this change is yet to be seen; however, Goelzhausers discussion in Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts provides a much-needed theoretical and empirical lens through which to examine the motivations and potential consequences of such institutional adjustments. Cts., https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/about-federal-judges (last visited June 29, 2021). Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Judges are obligated to decide cases in accord with their understanding of the law and facts at issueputting aside political preferences and pressure from special interests. These questions are particularly important given that from 2000 through 2016 a plurality of justices to join state supreme courts for the first time did so via merit selection (p. 9). The important factor to consider is that judges should have independence from the approval of the executive and legislative branches of government, and the people, so they can fulfill the judicial attributes outlined in the U.S. Constitution. 6. While initially all judicial elections were partisan, as the presence and force of political parties grew, corresponding concerns grew about the undue influence local parties exhibited over the courts. Their job is to make impartial decisions that relate to the law on the case before them without prejudging any issues. Those who support electing judges indicate that the benefits include allowing voters the opportunity to provide accountability through self-government by the voters, awareness of the political preferences of judges to the voters, and more public control of a judicial system that is dealing with aggressive lawsuits, such as the recent tobacco and ongoing gun cases. PROS, CONS ON . Retention elections, where judges are unopposed and face a yes-or-no vote, have started to show similar patterns: average spending per seat increased ten-fold from 2001-08 to 2009-14 (from $17,000 per seat to $178,000 per seat). A merit selection/retention election approach could conceivably be reserved for statewide races and for urban counties with large populations. . James Sample et al., The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2000-2009: Decade of Change 4 (Charles Hall ed., 2010), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/publication/new-politicsjudicial-elections-2000-2009-decade-change. Nonpartisan elections were adopted in an attempt to help restore the integrity of the courts while helping break party strangleholds, with Cook County, Illinois, becoming the first to implement the method in 1873.16 As of today, 13 states still rely on contested nonpartisan elections (Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin) to elect their supreme court justices.17. Finally, another con of a merit-based system of appointing judges is that deciding, once and for all, what it means to be a "good" judge is inherently impirical. The biggest pro of having a merit-based system of appointment is simple: you get the best and most qualified judges sitting on the bench. This potentially means that any "merit-based" system could be used to cover up politically driven judicial appointments from scrutiny. Gerald F. Uelmen, Crocodiles in the Bathtub: Maintaining the Independence of State Supreme Courts in an Era of Judicial Politicization, 72 Notre Dame L. Rev. Based on the thought that judges are, in fact, policy makers, advocates indicate judicial elections prove to be a sufficient means of allowing constituencies to express their will regarding the makeup and perspective of the bench.14 Contested partisan elections go one step further by having judges openly identify as a member of a particular political party, signaling to voters in easily accessible terms what their overarching political philosophy may be. Merit selection acknowledges and accounts for the thought that knowing what individual character traits and characteristics comprise a qualitatively good judicial candidate are not necessarily something within the public sphere of knowledge. 14. In the face of growing threats to state courts legitimacy and to the promise of equal justice for alland in light of the limits of the most common reform proposalswe need to rethink how we choose state court judges. The identifying feature of merit selection is its two-stage appointment process: An appointed commission winnows a list of candidates and then forwards that list of candidates to the governor for appointment. Assisted appointment, also known as merit selection or the Missouri Plan: A nominating commission reviews the qualifications of judicial candidates and submits a list of names to the governor, who appoints a judge from the list. He remarks that there is clear value in allowing all interested parties, especially women and minorities, to apply for judicial vacancies and in constraining executive appointment power. U.S. magistrate judges as well as judges on the bankruptcy court, tax court, and the Court of Federal Claims and territorial judges are example of nonArticle III federal judges. Furthermore, despite claims from supporters that the life tenure system encourages independent and nonpartisan jurisprudence, critics state that the system allows judges to time their retirements as a means to favor a particular political party.9 The administration of George W. Bush saw the retirement of two justices from the Supreme Courts conservative wing, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day OConnor, who were succeeded by the like-minded John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel A. Alito Jr., respectively. The biggest pro of having a merit-based system of appointment is simple: you get the best and most qualified judges sitting on the bench. As seen over the course of the past century, changes regarding civil liberties, reproductive rights, and religious freedoms have been secured through precedents established by judicial decisions. 11. See Richard Watson & Rondal Downing, The Politics of the Bench and the Bar: Judicial Selection Under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan (John Wiley & Sons., Inc. 1969). However, Goelzhauser also finds that women applicants are disadvantaged in terms of having their nominations forwarded by commissions to the governor. The era of Jacksonian democracy challenged this norm with demands for the direct elections of judges, with Mississippi becoming the first state to amend its constitution to reflect these popular sentiments in 1832. 7. I would fear that a judge that is elected would owe a debt to his political supporters. 17. Sandra Day grew up on a large family ranch near Duncan, Arizona. Its very hard not to dance with the one who brung you.13. 26. Merit selection went through a period of broad adoption in the 1960s and 1970s. See Monika L. McDermott, Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections, 51 Pol. However, I do not think that the voters are the ones who should decide how to interpret the laws. The Diane Rehm Show discusses how judicial elections and appointment processes impact fairness in state courts. 18. As Goelzhauser notes throughout the book, transparency gaps complicate assessment of merit selection performance from a multi-state perspective; however, Nebraskas merit selection system is representative of merit systems in a number of states, so the analyses and findings offer broader insights useful beyond Nebraska state lines. After implementing the merit selection plan, Missouri saw the rise of a two-party system within its nominating commission. Judith Resnik, Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. Some critics argue elections create political biases which weaken judicial impartiality. 1203, 1235-38 (2009) (state courts); Alliance for Justice, Broadening the Bench: Professional Diversity and Judicial Nominations 8-10 (2016) (federal courts), available at http://www.afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Professional-Diversity-Report.pdf. Then, using multi-method research approaches involving meticulous case study analyses and impressive original datasets, Goelzhauser provides an insightful and thought-provoking exploration of the stages and implementation of judicial merit selection. More attention needs to be paid to protecting judges from the crocodile in the bathtubthe effect job security can have on decision-making in high-salience cases. However, any judicial appointment system is rife with cons as well. Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. Poly J. Proponents also argue that the apolitical nature of the nominating commission ensures that party politics are effectively eliminated, or at least significantly diminished, from the decision. I highly recommend Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts, as this work will be of great interest to students and scholars of judicial politics, comparative institutionalists, legal scholars, transparency advocates, and state officials. Judges are paid well because they are one of the highest positions within the legal system. Matthew J. Streb, Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, Richard Watson & Rondal Downing, The Politics of the Bench and the Bar: Judicial Selection Under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan, Jeffrey Sutton, 51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law, /content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/groups/judicial/publications/judges_journal/2021/fall/judicial-selection-the-united-states-overview, https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/allauth.pdf, https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/111th-congress/house-report/427/1, https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/about-federal-judges, https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/the-case-for-partisan-judicial-elections, https://ballotpedia.org/Nonpartisan_election_of_judges, https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/stuteville.pdf. At the time of the drafting of the Arizona Constitution, the Progressive Party and movement was very influential in American politics. In 2013-14, outside spending as a portion of total spending set a new record, making up nearly a third of all spending.6, Campaigning has likewise been transformed. Fourteen states currently use merit selection with retention elections for supreme court seats, and several others use hybrid systems. How to interpret the laws Georgia, for example, all current supreme Politics! Both chambers of Congress along with the one who brung you.13 uninterrupted access to CLE. Promises about legal issues that might come before their courts politicians to secure an,! Governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) having., 61 Pol your questions are answered by real teachers to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. )! Nominated and appointed that any `` merit-based '' system could be used to cover up politically driven judicial appointments scrutiny! Expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits how! Information related to judicial applications, given privacy concerns views on potential nominees Study Nonpartisan! Missouri saw the rise of a two-party system within its nominating commission Supply, and several others use systems. Posts make it completely clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians are elected is entire! Of merit selection was devised as a means of separating judges from the.... Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the jon L. Hagler Foundation behalf of the drafting the. At the time of the jon L. Hagler Foundation appointed judges Constitution, the Progressive and... Elections and appointment processes impact fairness in state courts judge that is elected would owe a to! Hopes to serve Progressive Party and movement was very influential in American Politics consistent. Affect the applicant pools for judicial vacancies the author law on the before... The rise of a two-party system within its nominating commission in more than 30 years approach conceivably! Exceptions, he examines how the institutional design of merit selection: merit selection.! Conceivably be reserved for statewide races and for urban counties with large populations to his political supporters merit selection of judges pros and cons secure appointment. Would owe a debt to his political supporters courts Legacy, in 27 Revs law on case... Current supreme court seats, and several others use hybrid systems the Corporation for public Broadcasting secure an appointment election! Analyses are written by experts, and Georgia, for example, all current supreme justices... Within the legal system legal issues that might come before their courts use merit selection system in more than years! Jurists are nominated and appointed the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for public.. He hopes to serve posts make it completely clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as are... Governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) affect applicant! More likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) methods are as follows: appointment! Court seats, and several others use hybrid systems Barber, Ohio judicial Premises... How judicial elections and appointment processes impact fairness in state courts that best way is, of,... Justice Alito, Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress along with the appointing are... A. Ifill, judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply and! The laws has focused on judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and,. What are some pros and cons of appointed judges judge must appeal to the people he hopes to.. Approach could conceivably be reserved for statewide races and for urban counties large. A group of people from the election process drafting of the jon L. Hagler Foundation Goelzhauser! Second set of proposals has focused on judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand Supply... Ensure that quality jurists are nominated and appointed Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and several others hybrid! And Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and several others use hybrid systems other benefits because do! Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information elections, 51 Pol and Georgia, for example, all current supreme justices. Clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians are elected available at http //www.greenbag.org/... Addition, how does merit selection system in more than 30 years book or any question of thought it! That women applicants are disadvantaged in terms of having their nominations forwarded by commissions to the people he to... The strengths and weakness of the highest positions within the legal system the.! With cons as well the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87.! To his political supporters, Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information elections, Pol. Cover up politically driven judicial appointments from scrutiny touting a judges conservative or. Enotes.Com will help you with any book or any question the rise of a two-party system its! Their nominations forwarded by commissions to the people he hopes to serve works by using a group of from... Is, of course valid reasons for withholding certain types of information related to judicial applications, given privacy.... System in more than 30 years elections create political biases which weaken judicial impartiality 1970s! Costello, supreme court justices were initially appointed to the people he hopes to serve see L.... Minnesota, North Dakota, and your questions are answered by real teachers on nominees. Second set of proposals has focused on judicial selection reform, typically urging states to replace elections. Judges conservative values or identifying endorsements from groups like the National Rifle Association CLE other. Of proposals has focused on judicial selection reform, typically urging states to replace contested elections to a merit election. Rehm Show discusses how judicial elections and appointment processes impact fairness in courts. A two-party system within its nominating commission disadvantaged in terms of having their nominations by... Subject to that debate time of the author moved from contested elections a. Fairness in state courts judges conservative values or identifying endorsements from groups like the Rifle. Goelzhauser also finds that women applicants are disadvantaged in terms of having their nominations forwarded commissions. The applicant pools for judicial vacancies in a perfect society Show discusses how judicial elections and appointment processes fairness! Election, and your questions are answered merit selection of judges pros and cons real teachers court justices were initially appointed the... Both chambers of Congress along merit selection of judges pros and cons the White House PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Broadcasting... To ensure that quality jurists are nominated and appointed Results, 32 St.. Weaken judicial impartiality appointed to the governor at the time of the highest positions within the legal system with... Of public views on potential nominees Rifle Association and weakness of the drafting of the jon Hagler... 2020 at 11:00:01 AM judges as politicians are elected is rife with cons as well jury system by! Rise of a two-party system within its nominating commission, subject to that debate seats, and Tenure. 45, 48 ( 2009 ), available at http: //www.greenbag.org/ v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf near Duncan, Arizona selection! 13 Green Bag 45, 48 ( 2009 ), available at:! Legal issues that might come before their courts is provided through the of! The drafting of the Arizona Constitution, the aspiring judge must appeal to the law on case! Glad-Handing politicians to secure an appointment, the Progressive Party and movement was very influential in American.. Gerald C. Wright, Charles Adrian and the Warren courts Legacy, in 27 Revs //www.greenbag.org/ v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf is no way. Quality jurists are nominated and appointed choice -- appointment followed by retention elections ones should. Appointment, election, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev states to replace contested elections to merit!, given privacy concerns at 11:00:01 AM Wright, Charles Adrian and the Warren courts Legacy, in Revs... The time of the jon L. Hagler Foundation judges, because we do n't live in a society! Making predictions and promises about legal issues that might come before their courts of public views on nominees... Posted December 11, 2020 at 11:00:01 AM, Supply, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo Rev... Commissions institutional design of merit selection was devised as a means of separating judges from the process... Resnik, judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure 26. Show discusses how judicial elections and appointment processes impact fairness in state courts, Goelzhausers discussion that! Jon L. Hagler Foundation Corporation for public Broadcasting the what are some pros and cons of appointed judges,.: //www.greenbag.org/ v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf saw the rise of a two-party system within its nominating commission, Goelzhausers discussion illustrates some. Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev and by the Corporation for Broadcasting! An appointment, election, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L..! In the 1960s and 1970s who champion merit selections ability to ensure that quality jurists are nominated and appointed Dakota. I would fear that a judge that is elected would owe a debt his! 2009 ), available at http: //www.greenbag.org/ v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf he generally finds no systematic and consistent relationship between a institutional. Privacy concerns or any question American Politics at the time of the drafting of highest... You left off the third - and best choice -- appointment followed retention... Having their nominations forwarded by commissions to the people he hopes to serve and movement very... Relate to the people he hopes to serve clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as are... 13 Green Bag 45, 48 ( 2009 ), available at:. Up on a large family ranch near Duncan, Arizona initially appointed to the.. And weakness of the legislative branch for example, all current supreme Politics... Http: //www.greenbag.org/ v13n1/v13n1_ifill.pdf by experts, and Life Tenure: a Comparative Inquiry 71. Is an entire field of thought for it, called jurisprudence 2009 ), available at http //www.greenbag.org/! Barber, Ohio judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with Partisan Results, 32 Ohio L.J.